History, rather than ideology, probably has more to do with the fact that the political space of Christian Democracy in South Africa is vacant.
The fact is that approximately 80 percent of the population indicate that they are Christian, yet in political terms this is approximately the percentage of voters who vote for humanist parties such as the ANC and DA.
This is partially a New World feature, but also something reflecting the so called English speaking world.
In Britain politics are dominated by parties such as the Labour Party, the Tories end the Liberals. Across the English Channel, politics are in broad terms dominated by Christian Democracy and Social Democracy. History also has much to do with this reality, but the fixed patterns also came about by constituency based and proportional election systems. A constituency based MP basically only needed to ensure the voters in his area that he goes to church, and that was it.
In New World countries such as Australia, SA and Canada Christian Democratic parties as a general rule are small. In Germany, the Netherlands and Flanders, for e.g. the CDP's at present are the largest parties in the ruling coalitions.
In the Netherlands, the third largest party in the coalition is the ChristenUnie.
In the effectively two party system of the USA Christian democracy is active through lobbies with well defined policies, such as the four million paid up members strong Christian Coalition of America.
Although, in style and expression there are large differences between the large European CDP's and the New World CDP's, there are certain commonalities:
- Based on family values, with the understanding that these should be good family values.
- They are morality inclined, and therefore as a rule oppose matters such as abortion on demand.
- Authority lies at the lowest possible level, the subsidiary principle. School governing bodies would thus be seen as extensions of the family, rather than the state and so effectively scrapping controversy on religious teachings in school.
- The insight in a Bill of Human Rights is more developmentally orientated than humanist, and there is a stronger focus on minority rights.
- "Welfare state" insights are more based on the Biblical principle of looking after the poor than had outs, and therefore much focus is placed on enabling the poor to earn a better living through work, and restoration of dignity.
It is often believed that Christian Democracy stems from Roman Catholic origins where the church stands central, with other spheres of life such as the state, branching out of the church. This may be true in some cases, especially from the Latin states and even Belgium where the formal links between Christian Democracy and the Catholic Church were severed only a few decades ago, but the Dutch CDA is described in literature as 'n "Protestant" party, and the majority of German CDU members are probably Lutheran. The Dutch ChristenUnie was born out of the Gereformeerd Verbond.
Christian Democracy is broadly defined in terms of two larger groupings, namely the morally based parties and the family based parties. In fact, when there was a split in the Australian CDP between the leader, Fred Nile, and his former more level headed deputy, Dr., Moyles, the latter joined the Family First party.
The South African reality is that the parties operating in the humanist field overcrowd a section of the pool, whilst the Christian Democracy side is effectively vacant. This is discussed in some length at http://fotostaatsentrum.posterous.com/the-death-bell-has-not-tolled-for-cope-not-ye
And
http://fotostaatsentrum.posterous.com/kreeftegang-vir-cope
and thus not repeated.
To rectify matters is what is more important, and this will be no easy task considering the general South African media orientation.
But some matters are more simplistic. Far too many CDP's in the New World have for various reasons developed dictatorship style one man leaderships. A lot of energy is spent on the fortification of this situation, including character murder of challengers. Leadership mistakes accumulate and the image of the party is tarnished. Even, from a distance, this is apparently what is happening in Australia where the party decided some time ago the leader will remain unchallenged until such time as he himself decides it is time to retire.
In South Africa the foot work was done very well to establish a party in the Christian Democratic sphere, as was amply demonstrated that when the party was launched, the policy framework and many more were effectively carbon copies of those found on the web sites of the Canadian and New Zealand Christian Heritage Parties, the Australian CDP, the Christian Coalition of America and the ChristenUnie.
The derailing probably came with a "Africanist course" in style and image, very strange and uncomfortable to main stream whites in the main stream, especially Afrikaans churches. These churches, simultaneously, over stretched the "autonomy of state and church" as reaction to a previous dispensation when these churches "supplied" the moral base for the previous (apartheid) dispensation.
The result is that it is OK to, on Sundays, attend the sermons of churches where abortions on demand are wrong, gambling is wrong, etc, but after church lock the Lord in church and be active in parties favouring abortions on demand and support the Lotto. It is even OK for the preachers themselves to overtly involve them with this schizophrenic behaviour by overtly supporting church members who become candidates, etc.
From a Christian democracy viewpoint, this literally allows church members to be active members of parties getting away with murder.
There can be no doubt that Christian democracy in South Africa is not where it should be, especially as the largest parties also do not supplement in this role. (The DA tries to compromise by giving a freedom of choice to members on matters such as abortion, gay marriages, the death penalty etc, which is only feasible as long as the party is not a ruling party).
How should Christian Democracy go about to become the force it should be?
One of the most difficult tasks would be to portray the "should be" position through the media. What springs to mind is the American study indicating the average American journalist to be more liberal than the average American. The SABC (and other media) seldom or ever refer to Angela Merkel's party as a Christian Democratic party, but to the party as 'n "conservative party".
Very few South Africans are aware of the fact that South Africa is, in terms of modern politics, actually "backward" through the vacancy of the Christian Democratic option. Marketing principles dictate that people must first know that a product exists before a need for the product can develop.
The South African media are almost void of the international rumblings on the "morality in the media and with politicians."
Several political parties in South Africa have made several expressions on corruption and a lack of morality, but this is based on (opportunist) policy, rather than enshrined principle, as is the case with Christian Democracy.
Local parties also find it difficult to portray their "linkage" to a large world movement as the largest parties are also ruling parties, and thus bilateral contact with South Africa are with the ruling party. Not enough had been done to build strong ties when for e.g. the CDU was in opposition. The reasons vary from uncomfortableness with Europe, especially outside the UK, but also a local stance of the larger CDP's (the so called People's Parties, not being "Christian enough." Yet, the building of relations with the European Christian Party Movement (ECPM) spearheaded by the ChristenUnie, is also mostly severely neglected. The result is that South African voters perceive Christian Democracy as something small, and heavily divided, and often with some ridiculous statements by a little dictator.
It will be no easy task to scramble together the host of CDP's in South Africa, and various personal end complicated reasons exist for this. Efforts by well meaning institutions to mould together the combined force, will be very difficult.
It seems as though a fresh initiative is needed, large enough to create the required profiling, starting with a well based and balanced policy, a conference under non aligned chairmanship such as people of the calibre of the stature of Desmond Tutu and FW de Klerk
A lot of forgiveness is outstanding, but so is remorse, the prerequisite for real forgiveness.